The Search for Extraterrestrial Life continues. You’ve all heard of the “habitable zone” – the narrow range of distances from the host star at which a planet will have liquid water, an essential condition for life? Well actually it would seem scientists have identified at least eight habitable zones in which a planet must reside in order to harbor advanced life. Treat yourself to this.
Here is a link to another blogger’s commentary on the very recent discovery of Kepler 452b, an “extrasolar” planet orbiting a nearby star, illustrating very intelligibly why so much fine-tuning is necessary in order for any planet to be habitable for life, especially complex life:
http://rtbsydneychapter.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/is-kepler-452b-really-earth-20-bigger.html
Anthony and I are members of what Reasons to Believe calls its “apologetics community.” I took a training course and was granted admission to their bulletin board in which approx. 250 scientists and lay people from many backgrounds from all over the world participate. (It looks like Anthony is in Australia!) Generally I can get several knowledgeable answers to most technical questions in a day or two.
The original article appears above the line; Anthony’s comments are below. Enjoy!
Neither public policy nor church policy with regard to same-sex attraction (SSA) should be formed in ignorance of the essential nature of homosexuality as reflected in the best scientific evidence available. The Survey was first posted June 26, 2015, the day the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Obergefel v. Hodges. Click here to read the February 27, 2016 update.
Today I received an e-mail from a reader asking, “What can I do?” And I responded:
Will,
I’m not ready to say the battle is lost. I prefer to emphasize the fact that we have the victory and really cannot lose.
However, we will lose (although here I am not even talking about the political contest) if our response is merely a repeat of “the Christian Right” of the 1980s and 1990s. How do we avoid that?
First, pray.
Next, remember that the battle is not ours, but God’s. Gays’ quarrel is not with us – it is with God and His Word. Let them wrestle with Him and with their own consciences.
Next, when we address the question of homosexuality, always lead with God’s love and grace and His offer of forgiveness in His wonderful son Jesus. Emphasize that we are all sinners. There was a good article about this in Sunday’s NY Times Online: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/05/opinion/sunday/why-evangelicals-should-love-the-pope.html.
Remember that religious freedom includes the non-establishment of religion as well as the right to the free exercise of religion. That means that it is never enough to quote the Bible in a debate about public policy. If the government were to adopt a policy based solely on scripture, it would constitute an unconstitutional establishment of religion. Furthermore, in very practical terms, religious appeals are of no use if we hope to persuade those who do not already understand that the Bible is God’s Word; and of course that is the task. If we venture into policy advocacy at all, we must be prepared with non-religious grounds for our point of view.
Next, inform yourself. This is something I have not yet completed by any means, but I am working on it. It’s my view that homosexuality is very poorly understood scientifically, but that if it were understood, the biblical view would be vindicated. This would merely be a corollary of the “Two Books” model, would it not? Our understanding of nature is aided by our understanding of the Bible, and vice versa. So we should make sure we are familiar with the scientific literature that does exist, try to form some understanding of what research still needs to be done, and advocate for the funding of that research.
Finally, pray.
Tom
Joshualetter 