Book Review: Bart Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why

In 2010 and 2011 I was a student in Biola University’s master’s degree program in Science and Religion.  I benefitted greatly.  In the course of my studies I was required to produce an extensive catalog of essays on interesting topics.  It’s my intention to publish the best of them here from time to time.  This is the first of that series.  I hope you enjoy it.  Click here.

“The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus” by Gary Habermas & Michael Licona.

This is FREE at Amazon for Kindle!  (February 22, 2016 update: No, it’s not free, it costs about $14.  But I didn’t lie, it really was free when I downloaded it.  I don’t know what happened.  But it’s still worth the price.)

Habermas is regarded by many as the world’s foremost authority on the Resurrection, and Licona is the author of the definitive The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach (Nottingham, England: IVP Academic 2010).

Listen, please: if you want to know the truth and can read, then read this: (click here.)

The Catholic Church at Year Zero

Three days ago Ross Douthat, a columnist for the New York Times, published an excellent essay concerning the debate among Catholics on the permissibility of the admission to communion of Catholics who have remarried without the formal church annulment of a previous marriage.  Please have a look at his essay here, and if you are so inclined, see my comment here.

Meditation on Communion

The meal in the upper room has continued uninterrupted for 2000 years.  We, the church universal, are all present at that meal, in the upper room; and Jesus says, “This is my body.”  And so we are.

On the night He was betrayed, when the Lord offered bread to His disciples, He said, Take this and eat it; this is my body.  Similarly, when he offered them the cup, he said, Drink of the cup, all of you; this is my blood.  Do this in remembrance of me.

Ever since the Lord shared with His disciples that Last Supper, believers have been wondering what He meant when He said that a loaf of bread was His Body, and what He meant when He said that a cup of wine was His blood.  Some have interpreted these statements literally, saying that we actually eat His flesh and drink His blood; others have claimed that the bread and wine are only symbolic of His body and blood; it has even been argued that the body is in the bread, or over it, or underneath it or around it.  None of these interpretations has ever satisfied me.

When I hold that morsel of bread in my hand, waiting for everyone to receive, I do as the Lord commanded: I remember Him, and I meditate on His words to the disciples.  Then, at a word from the pastor, I place the bread in my mouth.  I begin to chew, and I taste the bread.  As I am tasting it, I hear the words in my mind, “This is my body,” and I realize that I am doing what all believers have done since the night in the upper room, and which all believers will continue to do until the very last Day.  And it is not so much the taste of the bread itself, but the fact that it is I who am tasting it, which identifies me with His people, and which proves to me that I am His.  “This is my body” becomes for me, “You belong to me.”

Then I open my eyes and I look around me, and I see you also taking the bread!  And again I hear the words, “This is my body.”  And so by our sharing of this sacrament, you see, “This is my body” becomes, “We belong to Him and to each other,” and it becomes, “He is here, among us.”

Similarly, when the flavor of the wine bursts in my mouth, I taste the sharpness of the wounds that caused Him to bleed and die, and it is proof to me – proof that I can taste! – that my sins are forgiven.  Blessed be the Lord, and may His Name be praised forever and ever!

Eat, then, rejoicing that we belong to Him, and to each other!

Drink, rejoicing that your sins are forgiven!

SYMPOSIUM ON AMERICAN SLAVERY

Introduction

It has been fifteen years since Jack Davidson, then pastor at Cascade Presbyterian Church (Presbyterian Church in America) in Eugene, Oregon, Robert Iltis, Professor of Communications at Oregon State University, and I presented our Symposium on American Slavery.  The papers which we read publicly were formerly available at the original Joshua Letter web site, and with this post are available again.

The nation continues, of course, to struggle with the topics of race and the former condition of Negro servitude, as it must.  The Civil War is not as long past as we may wish to think.  Racism is very persistent in American society, as evidenced by consistent patterns of discrimination in our justice system and in our housing policies.  This concerns the church not only because we are American citizens, but also because the church has a prophetic role to play in society by bringing a biblical critique to bear upon injustice.  What’s more, the Gospel mission itself depends in part upon the demonstration that the biblical view of man provides the only philosophically adequate basis for opposing racism.  It is the doctrine of the creation of man in the image of a personal God which alone justifies our recognition of one another’s inherent value and dignity.

This doctrine of creation may be placed in doubt by claims that the Bible approves of slavery.  One such claim was made by Steve Wilkins and Douglas Wilson, the former a minister in the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA), in their book entitled, Southern Slavery, As it Was.  (Moscow, ID: Canon Press, 1996.)  This book was the precipitating factor for the Symposium.  Dr. Davidson felt compelled to provide a refutation, and he invited contributions by Dr. Iltis and me.

Since then, Dr. Davidson was awarded his doctorate by the University of Wales for his dissertation on Eli Caruthers, the North Carolina antebellum Presbyterian pastor who authored an unpublished manuscript offering “a scripturally based alternative to the nineteenth-century hermeneutics supporting slavery.”  (Publication of the dissertation is pending elsewhere.)  Also since then, in 2011 Douglas Wilson published an interview (https://vimeo.com/25338963) in which he makes it plain enough that his views have not changed.

Beyond that, the scriptures themselves are not without difficulty on this question.  Exodus 21:16 states that “Anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession.”  (NIV) That would seem to preclude categorically any attempt at a biblical defense of the American form of slavery.  The mere fact that Exodus 21:16 addresses the culpability of only the kidnaper himself would not absolve a purchaser of the victim, since if kidnaping for profit is a crime, then purchasing the victim would make one an accessory.

Moses did countenance other forms of slavery, however.  Leviticus 25:39-54 provides for Jews and non-Jews to sell themselves.  Jews who sold themselves were to be treated as hired workers, not slaves, and were to be released at the Jubilee, which occurred every 50th year.  Non-Jews, however, “You can bequeath . . . to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.”  Lev. 25:46.

Does that mean Jews were permitted to be ruthless with their non-Jewish slaves?  It does seem that if that had been the case, no one would have sold himself.  More to the point is Leviticus 19:33, which provides:

When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them.  The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born.  Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt.  I am the Lord your God.

The enslaving of foes conquered in war was also practiced both in biblical times and in Africa in the 18th and 19th Centuries; but the Bible nowhere sanctions the practice.

We hope that those who read the following essays will find them useful and encouraging.

THE ESSAYS

Wrong About the History of Southern Slavery: A Response to Steve Wilkins and Douglas Wilson’s History of Slavery

by Rev. Jack Davidson

Wrong About the Bible : A Response to Steve Wilkins and Douglas Wilson’s Doctrine of Slavery

by Rev. Jack Davidson

Peculiar History in Slavery As It Was

by Robert S. Iltis

The Fraudulent Legal History of Sourthern Slavery, As It Was

by Thomas O. Alderman

Slavery and the American Constitution

by Thomas O. Alderman

More Exciting Findings Show Earth’s Uniqueness

The Search for Extraterrestrial Life continues.  You’ve all heard of the “habitable zone”  – the narrow range of distances from the host star at which a planet will have liquid water, an essential condition for life?  Well actually it would seem scientists have identified at least eight habitable zones in which a planet must reside in order to harbor advanced life.  Treat yourself to this.

Excellent Illustration of Fine-Tuning of the Earth

Here is a link to another blogger’s commentary on the very recent discovery of Kepler 452b, an “extrasolar” planet orbiting a nearby star, illustrating very intelligibly why so much fine-tuning is necessary in order for any planet to be habitable for life, especially complex life:

http://rtbsydneychapter.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/is-kepler-452b-really-earth-20-bigger.html

Anthony and I are members of what Reasons to Believe calls its “apologetics community.”  I took a training course and was granted admission to their bulletin board in which approx. 250 scientists and lay people from many backgrounds from all over the world participate.  (It looks like Anthony is in Australia!)  Generally I can get several knowledgeable answers to most technical questions in a day or two.

The original article appears above the line; Anthony’s comments are below.  Enjoy!

What is Homosexuality? A Survey of the Scholarly Literature

Neither public policy nor church policy with regard to same-sex attraction (SSA) should be formed in ignorance of the essential nature of homosexuality as reflected in the best scientific evidence available.  The Survey was first posted June 26, 2015, the day the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Obergefel v. Hodges.  Click here to read the February 27, 2016 update.